The Fales (Experts)
In the world of media and with the spread of satellite channels and social media, the phenomenon of what is known as (experts) has emerged, and these are a group of people supported by the so-called pressure groups in the media. In front of the people, they are closer to mercenaries, because they do not believe in the ideas they present, but they have the material with which they deceive the public by presenting them under the title (Expert), so the security expert, the economic expert, the legal expert, the financial expert, the military expert, etc., appeared to us with titles aimed at making an impact on the public. The influence is not limited to the media only, but it comes to directing public policies through the events of a populist trend that believes that these (experts) and what they have (experiences) are able to provide magical solutions to all the problems facing society, especially with the spread of (shops) that Doctoral and master's degrees are sold to those who pay more or to the person with influence or position, who is only interested in putting the letters (Dr) in front of his name to include his (abnormal) abilities, the authority of (science) after he guaranteed the authority of money and the authority of the position.
The adjective (expert) has turned into a terrifying way to lead populist public opinion by deceiving reality with an academic, scientific and cultural cover through which it is easy to lead general trends in a specific direction, whether by communicating a specific plan or standing against a certain intellectual trend or falsifying specific facts about an idea, person or group a particular one. Regardless of the efficiency standard, the matter requires nothing but an official suit and an elegant tie, a microphone and a loud voice ready to utter insults when needed with the ability to distribute accusations when necessary in line with the political or religious orientations adopted by the host and which are dictated to the (expert) before appearing on the the screen .
The emergence of such a category of those who can be called (algae intellectuals) because they are like algae, they have no roots, but climb to reach their goal, not only challenges the credibility of media work, but it also pushes to spread misconceptions among society and mislead public opinion instead of guiding it. It challenges the ability of the academic class in general because it presents a picture of a lack of professional and academic credibility that negatively affects the reputation of that class in general. For example, when a so-called (legal expert) provides false information about the Iraqi constitution, for example, this is reflected in the image of all law degree holders in the country, because the recipient says if this is what the (expert) says, let alone the expert. The same applies to the rest of the (experts), whose danger increases with their rush to serve the goals of the party that presents them to the public, knowing that violating these trends means the interruption of invitations to appear in the media again and the interruption of the returns that accompany that appearance.
Those (algae experts) share common features with which it is easy to detect them and reveal their truth, and the most prominent of these features is the tone of confidence that distinguishes the sounds that come out of their mouths, or as one of the (legal experts) expressed it by saying (I say the legal paragraph and until the recipient is sure of its authenticity, the program has ended and received reward) This confident tone makes it difficult to dispute what they say. The second and most dangerous feature is presenting (the facts) in a way that suggests that the speaker was a participant in formulating the events. Rather, the (officials) were not taking action without contacting the speaker to take an opinion and advice on what they say or do.But the most revealing feature of those (experts) is that what they say is always in harmony with the opinion of those with power and influence, such as when a (security expert) appears to confirm that the (explosion) caused only minor losses, although the displayed pictures confirm that the losses are in the hundreds, but they multiply conclusive assurances Contrasting with the facts, it is important that those assertions be close to the desire of the street and consistent with the tendencies of those in power. Therefore, it is not surprising to see the same (expert) presenting a viewpoint on a TV channel, and less than an hour later we see him on another TV channel adopting a completely different viewpoint just because the other channel differs. in its political and social orientation.They have understood the nature of the game, so their entry into the circle of elites and their acceptance necessitates that they say what the sponsor that carries out the process of financing, polishing and presenting thinks, even if these trends differ from the reality of what they believe completely, and among the phrases that falsifiers repeat about their opponents that they did not understand any of the lessons History, and the mark recorded in the words of the counterfeiters are the caustic formulas, and the definitive judgments.
Another important feature that distinguishes the (experts) is the presence in almost all public affairs, the ease in accusing others, and the proportion of incorrect positions to their opponents, which are often unfounded, but embarrass the other interlocutor or opponent for a period of time and turn him from a position of attack to a position of defense. In most cases, the media doors are closed to these opponents, so they cannot respond.
Finally, those (experts) are armed with a long list of scientific titles that precede their names in order to give them the scientific character, which is the scientific guarantee of their words, and in their work they rely on the shortness of the memory of the receiving public. This economic measure will bring him and the job opportunities that it will provide, relying on the fact that any economic measure to show its results will need several months. The recipient masses will have forgotten their first words in the event of the failure of that economic measure, which will be able to put forward ideas different from what they presented previously with their ability to exploit their influence in order to silence their opponents. .
The devastating effect left by these (experts) is manifested in planting false ideas and information that are accepted by the recipient as conclusive facts as long as they are issued by people described by the media as (experts) holding high (certificates), and some of them are (technocrats), meaning that a man in the street cannot imagine that Such people could mislead him, deceive him, or provide him with wrong information. Perhaps the most prominent example of the destructive role of the likes of these (experts) has emerged during the uprising of the Iraqi street during the years 2019-2020. These (experts) were used to disperse the momentum of the uprising by injecting false information about the law and about the possibilities of international intervention to protect the demonstrators, or falsifying communications with the International Criminal Court, as well as false information about the constitution. This information had a tangible effect in dispersing the efforts of the demonstrators and leading them in the wrong direction.
The adjective (expert) has turned into a terrifying way to lead populist public opinion by deceiving reality with an academic, scientific and cultural cover through which it is easy to lead general trends in a specific direction, whether by communicating a specific plan or standing against a certain intellectual trend or falsifying specific facts about an idea, person or group a particular one. Regardless of the efficiency standard, the matter requires nothing but an official suit and an elegant tie, a microphone and a loud voice ready to utter insults when needed with the ability to distribute accusations when necessary in line with the political or religious orientations adopted by the host and which are dictated to the (expert) before appearing on the the screen .
The emergence of such a category of those who can be called (algae intellectuals) because they are like algae, they have no roots, but climb to reach their goal, not only challenges the credibility of media work, but it also pushes to spread misconceptions among society and mislead public opinion instead of guiding it. It challenges the ability of the academic class in general because it presents a picture of a lack of professional and academic credibility that negatively affects the reputation of that class in general. For example, when a so-called (legal expert) provides false information about the Iraqi constitution, for example, this is reflected in the image of all law degree holders in the country, because the recipient says if this is what the (expert) says, let alone the expert. The same applies to the rest of the (experts), whose danger increases with their rush to serve the goals of the party that presents them to the public, knowing that violating these trends means the interruption of invitations to appear in the media again and the interruption of the returns that accompany that appearance.
Those (algae experts) share common features with which it is easy to detect them and reveal their truth, and the most prominent of these features is the tone of confidence that distinguishes the sounds that come out of their mouths, or as one of the (legal experts) expressed it by saying (I say the legal paragraph and until the recipient is sure of its authenticity, the program has ended and received reward) This confident tone makes it difficult to dispute what they say. The second and most dangerous feature is presenting (the facts) in a way that suggests that the speaker was a participant in formulating the events. Rather, the (officials) were not taking action without contacting the speaker to take an opinion and advice on what they say or do.But the most revealing feature of those (experts) is that what they say is always in harmony with the opinion of those with power and influence, such as when a (security expert) appears to confirm that the (explosion) caused only minor losses, although the displayed pictures confirm that the losses are in the hundreds, but they multiply conclusive assurances Contrasting with the facts, it is important that those assertions be close to the desire of the street and consistent with the tendencies of those in power. Therefore, it is not surprising to see the same (expert) presenting a viewpoint on a TV channel, and less than an hour later we see him on another TV channel adopting a completely different viewpoint just because the other channel differs. in its political and social orientation.They have understood the nature of the game, so their entry into the circle of elites and their acceptance necessitates that they say what the sponsor that carries out the process of financing, polishing and presenting thinks, even if these trends differ from the reality of what they believe completely, and among the phrases that falsifiers repeat about their opponents that they did not understand any of the lessons History, and the mark recorded in the words of the counterfeiters are the caustic formulas, and the definitive judgments.
Another important feature that distinguishes the (experts) is the presence in almost all public affairs, the ease in accusing others, and the proportion of incorrect positions to their opponents, which are often unfounded, but embarrass the other interlocutor or opponent for a period of time and turn him from a position of attack to a position of defense. In most cases, the media doors are closed to these opponents, so they cannot respond.
Finally, those (experts) are armed with a long list of scientific titles that precede their names in order to give them the scientific character, which is the scientific guarantee of their words, and in their work they rely on the shortness of the memory of the receiving public. This economic measure will bring him and the job opportunities that it will provide, relying on the fact that any economic measure to show its results will need several months. The recipient masses will have forgotten their first words in the event of the failure of that economic measure, which will be able to put forward ideas different from what they presented previously with their ability to exploit their influence in order to silence their opponents. .
The devastating effect left by these (experts) is manifested in planting false ideas and information that are accepted by the recipient as conclusive facts as long as they are issued by people described by the media as (experts) holding high (certificates), and some of them are (technocrats), meaning that a man in the street cannot imagine that Such people could mislead him, deceive him, or provide him with wrong information. Perhaps the most prominent example of the destructive role of the likes of these (experts) has emerged during the uprising of the Iraqi street during the years 2019-2020. These (experts) were used to disperse the momentum of the uprising by injecting false information about the law and about the possibilities of international intervention to protect the demonstrators, or falsifying communications with the International Criminal Court, as well as false information about the constitution. This information had a tangible effect in dispersing the efforts of the demonstrators and leading them in the wrong direction.
The fight against the phenomenon of (false experts) rests mainly on the real intellectuals in order to confront the lies and false information that affect the recipient. There is also the great role of federations, unions and professional organizations that must reveal the truth about those liars.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق